[1]王思彤,陈晓晨,朱学敏,等.长护险受益人共病现状及服务模式选择的影响因素分析[J].卫生经济研究,2022,39(9):39-42.
 WANG Sitong,CHEN Xiaochen,ZHU Xuemin,et al.Analysis of the Current Situation of Comorbidities in Beneficiaries of Long-Term Care Insurance and the Influencing Factors of Service Mode Selection[J].Journal Press of Health Economics Research,2022,39(9):39-42.
点击复制

长护险受益人共病现状及服务模式选择的影响因素分析
分享到:

卫生经济研究[ISSN:1004-7778/CN:33-1056/F]

卷:
39
期数:
2022年9期
页码:
39-42
栏目:
健康老龄化
出版日期:
2022-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Current Situation of Comorbidities in Beneficiaries of Long-Term Care Insurance and the Influencing Factors of Service Mode Selection
作者:
王思彤1陈晓晨2朱学敏34杨君婷56刘跃华34
1.清华大学医院管理研究院,广东 深圳 518057
2.南京市卫生健康委员会,江苏 南京 210019
3.清华大学万科公共卫生与健康学院,北京 100084
4.清华大学健康中国研究院,北京 100084
5.国家卫生健康委卫生发展研究中心,北京 100191
6.北京大学公共卫生学院,北京 100871
Author(s):
WANG Sitong CHEN Xiaochen ZHU Xuemin YANG Junting LIU Yuehua
Institute for hospital management, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen Guangdong 518057, China
关键词:
长期护理保险老年人共病率服务模式选择
Keywords:
long-term care insurance the elderly comorbidity rate choice of service mode
分类号:
F840.684;R197
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:分析长护险受益人的共病现状及服务模式选择的影响因素,为长护险制度优化提供建议。方法:以湖北省J市60岁及以上的长护险受益人共4 374人为研究对象,运用描述性统计、单因素分析及二分类Logistic回归分析长护服务模式选择的影响因素。结果:样本人群平均年龄79.43±9.72岁,平均失能评分20.23±12.67分,共病率为55.01%,修正Charlson共病指数5.93±1.39分;患病率最高的两类疾病为脑卒中(54.09%)和高血压(50.78%),89.73%的样本人群选择居家护理,高龄、重度失能、有家属照护、有职工医保的老年人更倾向于选择机构护理;地区也是长护服务模式选择的影响因素之一。结论:重视老年人共病管理,推动慢性病管理的优化升级,为高龄、重度失能老年人提供专业护理服务,减轻家庭照护负担,对居家护理服务采取合理监管手段,促进长护服务职业化发展。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the comorbidity status of long-term care insurance beneficiaries and the influencing factors of service model selection, and to provide suggestions for the optimization of long-term care insurance system. Methods A total of 4 374 long-term care insurance beneficiaries aged 60 and above in J City, Hubei Province were selected as the research objects. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis and binary logistic regression were used to analyze the influencing factors of long-term care service model selection. Results The average age of the sample population was 79.43±9.72 years old, the average disability score was 20.23±12.67 points, the comorbidity rate was 55.01%, and the modified Charlson comorbidity index was 5.93±1.39 points, the two types of diseases with the highest prevalence were stroke(54.09 %) and hypertension(50.78%). About 89.73% of the sample population chose home care, and the elderly, severely disabled, with family care and employee medical insurance were more inclined to choose institutional care. Region was also one of the influencing factors of the choice of long-term care service model. Conclusion It is suggested to pay attention to the management of comorbidities in the elderly, promote the optimization and upgrading of chronic disease management, provide professional nursing services for the elderly and severely disabled elderly, reduce the burden of family care, adopt reasonable supervision methods for home nursing services, and promote the professional development of long-term nursing services.

参考文献/References:

[1] 心洁,壹图.《中国居民营养与慢性病状况报告(2020年)》国务院新闻办公室2020年12月23日新闻发布会(摘要)[J].中老年保健,2021(2):14-21.
[2] 中华人民共和国民政部.关于提升城乡社区养老服务水平的提案答复的函(民函〔2020〕789号)[Z].2020-10-02.
[3] 人力资源社会保障部办公厅.关于开展长期护理保险制度试点的指导意见(人社厅发〔2016〕80号)[Z].2016-06-27.
[4] 国家医疗保障局,财政部.《关于扩大长期护理保险制度试点的指导意见》的公告(医保发〔2020〕37号)[Z].2020-09-16.
[5] 姚媛英.社区老年共病患者服药依从性及影响因素研究[D].开封:河南大学,2018.
[6] Mary E C,Robert E C,Janey C P,et al.The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients[J].Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,2008,61(12):1234-1240.
[7] 杨茹侠,黄春芳,谢红.某市长期护理保险利用对象护理模式选择意愿状况及其影响因素[J].医学与社会,2021,34(3):94-97.
[8] Marinda,Asiah,Nuril,et al.Family caregivers' perspectives for the effect of social support on their care burden and quality of life:a mixed-method study in rural and sub-urban central Japan[J].The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine,2019.
[9] 范文君.不同基本医疗保险的老年居民卫生服务利用研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2014.
[10] Anderson G.Chronic care:Making the Case for Ongoing Care. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2010[EB/OL].(2012-06-19)[2022-01-07].http//www.rwif.org/files/research/50968 chronic care. Chart Book.pdf.2012-06-19.
[11] Blakemore A,Hann M,Howells K,et al.Patient activation in older people with long-term conditions and multimorbidity:correlates and change in a cohort study in the United Kingdom[J].Bmc Health Services Research,2016,16(1):582.
[12] Boeckxstaens P.Multimorbidity:a quantitative and qualitative exploration in primary care[M].Ghent University,2014.
[13] Panza F,Solfrizzi V,Lozupone M,et al.An old challenge with new promises: a systematic review on comprehensive geriatric assessment in long-term care facilities[J].Rejuvenation Research,2017,21(1):3-14.
[14] 李燕.健康教育在社区老年慢性病生活方式管理中的效果[J].中国现代医生,2021,59(27):176-179.
[15] R.Tamara Konetzka,Daifeng He,Jing Dong,et al.Moral hazard and long-term care insurance[J].The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 2019, 44(2):231-251.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈晶晶,厉欣怡,董维真,等.安徽省农村老年人健康相关生命质量研究[J].卫生经济研究,2016,(07):23.
[2]杨付英,郝晓宁,薄 涛,等.我国老年人失能现状及其影响因素分析[J].卫生经济研究,2016,(11):7.
[3]张继荣,马 辉,祁 玲.老年人卫生服务需求及影响因素研究[J].卫生经济研究,2016,(11):29.
[4]谭 睿.我国长期护理保险制度的实践及思考[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(05):54.
[5]张 琳.我国长期护理保险的供需现状研究[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(06):30.
[6]路 云,颜俊娴,华 娟.老年人共病管理的研究现状及经验探究[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(07):58.
[7]裴 婕,常 峰,路 云,等.老年人基本药物全额保障的经验及启示[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(09):44.
[8]陈乐乐,曾雁冰*,方 亚.基于四部模型法的老年人医疗服务需求及利用影响因素研究[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(12):52.
[9]于 菲,耿顺利,贾 茜,等.陕西省不同地区老年人卫生服务利用公平性研究[J].卫生经济研究,2018,(01):34.
[10]李 芬,丁玲玲,王力男,等.上海市老年人医疗服务需求、利用及费用特征分析[J].卫生经济研究,2018,(06):26.

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-30