[1]崔仕臣,顾欣怡.欧洲长期照护现金支付的多样性研究与借鉴[J].卫生经济研究,2024,41(03):74-77,81.
　CUI Shichen,GU Xinyi.Study on the Diversity of Cash Payments for Long-Term Care in Europe[J].Journal Press of Health Economics Research,2024,41(03):74-77,81.
点击复制

欧洲长期照护现金支付的多样性研究与借鉴
分享到：

卫生经济研究[ISSN:1004-7778/CN:33-1056/F]

卷:
41
期数:
2024年03期
页码:
74-77,81
栏目:
他山之石
出版日期:
2024-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Diversity of Cash Payments for Long-Term Care in Europe
作者:
崔仕臣1; 顾欣怡1
1.温州医科大学，浙江 温州 325035
Author(s):
CUI Shichen;  GU Xinyi
Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Zhejiang 325035, China
关键词:
长期照护制度; 现金支付; 多样性; 欧洲
Keywords:
long-term care system;  cash payment;  diversity;  Europe
分类号:
F840.684
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：介绍欧洲典型国家长期照护现金支付的多样性，为我国发展长期照护现金支付提供借鉴。方法：基于已有研究，构建三维分析框架（由谁、如何、在哪），采用比较视角分析欧洲九个国家长期照护的现金支付规则。结果：欧洲各国对长期照护现金支付的选择有不同的理解，现金支付对象具有普遍性，现金支付的成功实施需要有合理的制度设计和规则。结论：我国应建立全国统一的长期护理保险制度，合理设计现金支付受益规则，为失能人员提供专业支持。
Abstract:
Objective To introduce the diversity of cash payments for long-term care in typical European countries, and to provide reference for the development of long-term care cash payments in China. Methods Based on existing studies, a three-dimensional analysis framework(by whom, how and where) was constructed, and the cash payment rules for long-term care in nine European countries were analyzed from a comparative perspective. Results In European countries, the understandings of the choice of cash payment for long-term care were different. The object of cash payment was universal, and the successful implementation of cash payment required reasonable system design and rules. Conclusion It is necessary to build a national unified long-term care insurance system in China, rationally design the rules for cash payment benefits, and provide professional support for the disabled.

参考文献/References:

[1] Da Roit B,Le Bihan B,?sterle A.Cash-for-care benefits[A].Long-Term Care Reforms in OECD Countries[M].Gori C,Fernandez J-L, Wittenberg R. Bristol:Policy Press,2015:143-166.
[2] Keigher S M.The limits of consumer directed care as public policy in an aging society s[J].Canadian Journal on Aging,1999,18(02):182-201.
[3] Arksey H, Kemp P.A.Dimensions of Choice:A Narrative Review of Cash-For-Care Schemes[R].Social Policy Research Unit,University of York,2008.
[4] Ungerson C.Whose empowerment and independence? A cross-national perspective on 'cash for care' schemes [J].Ageing & Society, 2004,24(24):189-212.
[5] Kremer, Monique.Consumer in charge of care: the dutch personal budget and its impact on the market, professionals and the family[J]. European Societies,2006,8(03):385-401.
[6] Benjamin A E.Consumer-directed services at home:a new model for persons with disabilities[J].Health Affairs,2001,20(06):80-95.
[7] Batavia,Andrew.Consumer direction,consumer choice,and the future of long-term care[J].Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 2002, 13(02):67-74.
[8] Doty P,Litvak K S.Consumer-directed models of personal care: lessons from Medicaid[J].The Milbank Quarterly,1996,74(03):377-409.
[9] Rostgaard,Tine.Constructing the care consumer:free choice of home care for the elderly in Denmark[J].European Societies,2006,8(03):443-463.
[10] Clarke J.Consumers,clients or citizens?Politics,policy and practice in the reform of social care[J].European Societies,2006,8(03):423-442.
[11] Roit B D,Bihan B L.Similar and yet so different:cash-for-care in six European countries' long-term care policies[J].Milbank Quarterly,2010,88(03):286-309.
[12] Lundsgaard J.Choice and Long-Term Care in OECD countries: care outcomes, employment and fiscal sustainabilty[J].European Societies,2006,8(03):361-383.
[13] Gori C,Morciano M.Cash for care payments in Europe: Changes in resource allocation[J].Social Policy & Administration, 2019,53(04):537-550.
[14] Moran N,Glendinning C,Wilberforce M,et al.Older people's experiences of cash-for-care schemes:evidence from the English Individual Budget pilot projects[J].Ageing & Society,2013,33(05):826-851.
[15] Aguilar-Hendrickson M.Long-term care in Spain: a reform failure or the regulation of a development path? [J].International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,2020,40(11):1301-1317.
[16] Ranci C,Pavolini E.Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe. Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts[M]. Springer NewYork Dordrecht Heidelberg,2013.
[17] 戴卫东.OECD国家长期护理保险制度研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社，2015：69-79.
[18] Da Roit B,Le Bihan B.Cash for long‐term care: Policy debates, visions,and designs on the move[J].Social Policy & Administration,2019,53(04):519-536.
[19] 殷俊，李晓鹤.法国长期护理津贴制度分析与经验借鉴[J]. 保险研究，2015（11）：86-94.
[20] 刘涛. 德国长期护理保险制度的缘起、运行、调整与改革[J]. 安徽师范大学学报（人文社会科学版），2021，49（01）：74-86.
[21] Gori C,Luppi M.Regulating the delivery of cash for care payments across Europe[J].Social Policy & Administration,2019,53(04):567-578.
[22] Roit B D,Bihan B L,?魻sterle A.Long-term care policies in Italy, Austria and France:variations in cash for care schemes[J].Social Policy & Administration,2007,41(06):653-671.
[23] 海龙.我国失能老人护理补贴政策的特征刻画与治理策略[J]. 湖南社会科学，2022（01）：112-119.
[24] 周林刚，张勇，吴进进.残疾人两项补贴政策瞄准偏误研究——基于深圳市的实证分析[J]. 中国人口科学，2022（04）：88-102,128.
[25] 戴卫东，汪倩格，朱儒城，等.长期护理保险试点政策的特征、问题与路径优化——基于两批29个国家试点城市政策的比较分析[J].中国软科学，2022（10）：41-50.

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-02-28