[1]张文钰,赵允伍,蒋心梅,等.安徽省异地就医直接结算的实践探索[J].卫生经济研究,2024,41(08):58-60,64.
 ZHANG Wenyu,ZHAO Yunwu,JIANG Xinmei,et al.Practical Exploration of Direct Settlement for Off-site Medical Treatment in Anhui Province[J].Journal Press of Health Economics Research,2024,41(08):58-60,64.
点击复制

安徽省异地就医直接结算的实践探索
分享到:

卫生经济研究[ISSN:1004-7778/CN:33-1056/F]

卷:
41
期数:
2024年08期
页码:
58-60,64
栏目:
医疗保障
出版日期:
2024-08-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Practical Exploration of Direct Settlement for Off-site Medical Treatment in Anhui Province
作者:
张文钰1赵允伍2蒋心梅2王 珩21
1.安徽医科大学卫生管理学院,安徽 合肥 230032
2.安徽医科大学第一附属医院,安徽 合肥 230022
Author(s):
ZHANG Wenyu ZHAO Yunwu JIANG Xinmei WANG Heng
School of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei Anhui 230032, China
关键词:
异地就医直接结算医疗保险分级诊疗
Keywords:
direct settlement for off-site medical treatment health insurance hierarchical diagnosis and treatment
分类号:
F840.684
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
当前,安徽省医保异地就医直接结算在完善待遇政策、提升服务质量、强化信息支撑等方面取得了一定成效,但也存在医保基金不合理流失、跨省异地基金监管难度大、直接结算与手工报销存在待遇差以及跨区域医疗机构虹吸效应较大等问题。对此,建议运用大数据挖掘,深入分析医保数据,探索开展区域间协同联查合作,持续推进长三角医保一体化,建立待遇补差业务协同规范;通过优质医疗资源扩容和下沉,发挥分级诊疗作用,推动形成有序的异地就医格局,不断优化异地就医直接结算制度。
Abstract:
At present, the direct settlement for off-site medical treatment in health insurance in Anhui Province has achieved certain results in improving treatment policies, improving service quality, and strengthening information support. However, there are also serious problems such as unreasonable loss of health insurance fund, great difficulty in supervision of cross-provincial health insurance fund, treatment difference between direct settlement and manual reimbursement, and large siphoning effect of cross-regional medical institutions. In this regard, it is recommended to use big data mining to analyze health insurance data in depth, explore inter-regional collaborative and joint investigation cooperation, continue to promote the integration of health insurance in the Yangtze River Delta, and establish collaborative norms for the treatment difference business. Through the expansion and sinking of high-quality medical resources, we can play the role of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, promote the formation of orderly pattern of off-site medical treatment, and continuously optimize the direct settlement system for off-site medical treatment.

参考文献/References:

[1] 安徽省医疗保障局.安徽省医疗保障局关于试行基本医疗保险“省内大病无异地”保障政策的通知[EB/OL].(2022-09-27)[2023- 10-14].http://ybj.ah.gov.cn/public/7071/147004491.html.
[2] 安徽省医保基金管理中心.关于优化提升全省异地就医直接结算服务的通知[EB/OL].(2023-02-22)[2023-10-20].https://ybj.ah.gov.cn/ztzl/ahsybjjglzx/ydjs/147734691.html.
[3] 安徽省医疗保障局.【安徽发布】安徽“掌上医保”升级啦![EB/OL].(2023-10-16)[2023-10-16].http://ybj.ah.gov.cn/xwzx/mtjj/148793261.html.
[4] 郑先平,吴超男,童潇,等.全域化视角下医疗保险门诊费用异地结算政策完善思考[J].中国卫生经济,2021,40(10):35-38.
[5] 方能圆.跨省异地就医住院费用直接结算待遇差的归因研究[D].南京:东南大学,2022.
[6] 窦一峰.数据挖掘技术在医保欺诈检测识别中的应用研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2018.
[7] 张娟,朱碧帆,侯晓慧,等.数据挖掘技术赋能医保监管——基于上海市医保监管实践[J].中国医疗保险,2023(10):91-95.
[8] 覃英华,李嘉程,张鑫,等.多元协同治理视角下医保基金监管成效及协同监管创新模式研究[J].中国医院管理,2021,41(11):12-16.
[9] 刘泽桦.区域一体化背景下医保异地就医管理的问题与对策研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2023.
[10] 许正圆,徐伟,黄晓青,等.长三角地区异地就医门诊费用直接结算现状、模式及难点[J].卫生经济研究,2022,39(02):70-74.
[11] 朱政.基层医保异地联网结算问题与对策的研究[D].南京:南京师范大学,2022.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 翔.取消“两定”审批对医保管理的影响及对策[J].卫生经济研究,2016,(03):56.
[2]赵 云,王政乂.公立医院体制机制与医疗保险付费方式适配的主要模式[J].卫生经济研究,2016,(05):22.
[3]于保荣.医保定点机构管理新政的探讨[J].卫生经济研究,2016,(07):43.
[4]姜海珊.农民工参加城镇职工医疗保险状况的比较分析[J].卫生经济研究,2016,(12):29.
[5]杨金侠,冀路肖.某省三种基本医疗保险支付方式调查与思考[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(02):39.
[6]胡善联.论美国特朗普新医改计划的前景[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(03):3.
[7]马 雷,柳俊杰,李 军,等.天津市恶性肿瘤医保患者自付状况分析[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(04):50.
[8]袁红梅,何克春,袁维福,等.医院医疗保险费用结算现状及对策研究[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(04):53.
[9]李芳凡,杨超柏.试论生育保险与医疗保险的合并[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(05):50.
[10]郑先平,傅强辉,刘 雅.“互联网+”背景下医疗保险异地结算路径优化[J].卫生经济研究,2017,(05):63.

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-08-01