[1]吴柜坊,张 媚,钟艳红,等.医保预算对不同等级医院费用及盈亏控制风险的影响研究[J].卫生经济研究,2026,43(04):48-54.
WU Guifang,ZHANG Mei,ZHONG Yanhong,et al.Study on the Impact of Medical Insurance Budget on the Cost and Profit-Loss Control Risks in Hospitals of Different Levels[J].Journal Press of Health Economics Research,2026,43(04):48-54.
点击复制
医保预算对不同等级医院费用及盈亏控制风险的影响研究
卫生经济研究[ISSN:1004-7778/CN:33-1056/F]
- 卷:
-
43
- 期数:
-
2026年04期
- 页码:
-
48-54
- 栏目:
-
医疗保障
- 出版日期:
-
2026-03-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Study on the Impact of Medical Insurance Budget on the Cost and Profit-Loss Control Risks in Hospitals of Different Levels
- 作者:
-
吴柜坊1; 张 媚1; 钟艳红1; 吕侯霞1; 祝晓蝶1
-
1.成都中医药大学管理学院,四川 成都 611137
- Author(s):
-
WU Guifang; ZHANG Mei; ZHONG Yanhong; LYU Houxia; ZHU Xiaodie
-
School of Management, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu Sichuan 611137, China
-
- 关键词:
-
医保预算; 医院等级; 费用结构弹性; 盈亏控制风险
- Keywords:
-
medical insurance budget; hospital grade; cost structure elasticity; profit-loss control risks
- 分类号:
-
R19
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
目的:对比分析医保预算下不同等级医院的住院费用结构特征与盈亏风险。方法:采用描述性分析、二元逻辑回归,分析医院的住院费用特征和盈亏风险。结果:一级医院IU29病组病例的住院收入与基金分配最多,例均结余108.33元,二级医院和三级医院例均亏损29.69元和287.49元;各级医院的服务收费弹性和商品收费弹性随住院费用增加呈“先降后升”趋势,三级医院的弹性波动最剧烈,二级医院最稳定;费用结构弹性显著影响病例盈亏状况。结论:优化医保预算管理模式,完善微观分配及动态调整机制;强化医院收入与成本管控,健全全面预算绩效管理机制;建立医保医疗协同治理机制,推动区域医疗资源统筹配置;探索跨系统数据共享模式,创新医保预算控制风险精准识别与预警机制。
- Abstract:
-
Objective To compare and analyze the inpatient cost structure characteristics and profit-loss risks of hospitals of different levels under medical insurance budget. Methods Descriptive analysis and binary logistic regression were employed to examine inpatient cost characteristics and profit-loss risks of hospitals. Results Primary hospitals had the highest inpatient revenue and fund allocation for IU29 diagnosis groups, with a mean surplus of 108.33 yuan per case, while secondary and tertiary hospitals had mean deficits of 29.69 yuan and 287.49 yuan per case, respectively. The elasticity of service fee and commodity fee showed a "decrease-then-increase" trend with rising inpatient costs across all hospital levels, with the most significant fluctuation the in tertiary hospitals and the most stability in secondary hospitals. Cost structure elasticity significantly affected the profit-loss status of the cases. Conclusion It is necessary to optimize medical insurance budget management models to refine micro-allocation and dynamic adjustment mechanisms, strengthen hospital revenue and cost control to improve comprehensive budget performance management systems, establish collaborative governance mechanisms between medical insurance and healthcare providers to promote regional resource allocation, and explore cross-system data sharing models to innovate precise risk identification and early warning mechanisms for medical insurance budget control.
参考文献/References:
[1] 王梦婷,阴建,朱奕潼,等.2013—2022年中国北方医院宫颈癌患者住院费用结构变动度和灰色关联法分析[J].中国公共卫生,2024,40(06):718-723.
[2] 何竞.医保预付制改革能否降低医疗费用——基于医疗要素投入的视角[J].经济论坛,2024(07):133-145.
[3] 司小平.DRG支付对住院患者医疗费用负担的影响研究[J].卫生经济研究,2025,42(01):61-64.
[4] 王泓涵,王敏,陈学红,等.基于DRG付费方式改革的公立医院财务决策研究[J].商讯,2024(19):53-56.
[5] 王妮.基于医保DRG管理的探索与实践[J].中国总会计师,2024(11):44-47.
[6] 王震.医疗服务价格改革与医保支付方式改革的政策协同[J].社会政策研究,2025(01):56-69,133-134.
[7] 戴晓鹂.弹性理论在《经济学》教学中的创新应用[J].高教学刊,2015(24):74-75.
[8] 李海明,王有强.卫生资源投入与健康中国建设:基于价值的卫生系统视角[J].中国行政管理,2018(08):65-69.
[9] 江蒙喜.人力资源价值创造视角下公立医院成本管控的实践探索[J].中国卫生经济,2022,41(08):67-70.
[10] 王祺,郭锦丽.基于医保公平视野下不同级别公立医院老年骨质疏松性骨折住院费用对比分析[J].卫生软科学,2024,38(08):69-72.
[11] 庞瑞芝,李倩楠.健康中国背景下的“看病贵”与政府支出——基于资源配置结构性失衡视角的分析[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2024,44(02):104-116.
[12] 周魅,赵绍阳,付明卫.公立医院规模扩张与过度医疗——来自医院等级变化的证据[J].经济科学,2021(01):109-121.
[13] 吕国营,赵曼.越评级越失衡?——我国医院等级评定与医生人力资源配置研究[J].经济管理,2018(07):110-127.
[14] 董展育,申广军,黄英伟,等.医院生产函数与需求函数的估计——兼论我国医院等级评审制度的影响[J].经济学(季刊),2025,25(01):86-102.
[15] 王婵,唐程翔,刘国恩,等.医生人力资本、就医可及性与医疗服务错配——基于某省医院微观数据的实证研究[J].经济学(季刊),2024,24(01):136-153.
[16] 汤琳琳,梁磬清,刘梦青,等.DRG政策对公立医院分级诊疗效果的影响及评价研究[J].中国医院,2025,29(02):50-55.
[17] 翟绍果,徐咪.数字经济时代医保治理的机制创新与政策路径[J].中国医疗保险,2024(02):72-82.
[18] 曾望峰.大数据助推实现医保治理现代化:价值、现状与路径[J].卫生经济研究,2023,40(09):33-35,39.
[19] 褚雷,王艺颖.技术治理视角下医保数字化转型的实践风险与应对[J].山东行政学院学报,2025(02):91-99.
更新日期/Last Update:
2026-03-30